Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Axillary intercourse

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Merge to Non-penetrative_sex. The content is rather trivial (one sentence), and there is a rough consensus that this short content should be preserved by merging to Non-penetrative_sex. (non-admin closure). Ruslik (talk) 20:18, 5 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Axillary intercourse

Sourced only from one article, so I'm not convinced of it's notability. rootology (C)(T) 04:49, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - while there are plenty of other references available (just search in Google), do we need to have them in this article as well as the one here? Non-penetrative sex gives a different reference for this particular action. Beeswaxcandle (talk) 05:31, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They need to be on each article, so readers know the article is legitimate and compliance with WP:N. What sources there apply to here? Please add them and let us know. rootology (C)(T) 05:40, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep That is two sources already and no doubt more can be found. It could also be merged, so I don't see a valid reason to delete this. -Mgm|^(talk) 08:25, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Dictionary definition, stick it in on a parent article, like Non-penetrative sex. - Jimmi Hugh (talk) 11:53, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.